Def Stan 05-138

Def Stan 05-138 and the four Cyber Risk Profile levels

The control set behind DEFCON 658 — what a supplier must actually hold at Level 0, 1, 2 and 3, and where Cyber Essentials fits.

Issue 4 was published on 23 May 2024 and last updated on 3 December 2025. It replaced five Cyber Risk Profiles — N/A, Very Low, Low, Moderate, High — with four: Level 0 to Level 3. CSM v3 profiles are not consistent with CSM v4, so a supplier working from the older vocabulary is describing a regime that no longer exists.

Why this reaches the test bench

DEFCON 658 is the contract condition that makes cyber requirements flow down the supply chain. Def Stan 05-138 is the document that says what you must actually have. A test system delivered into a defence programme sits inside both, and the controls land mostly on the delivered software and the test executive rather than on the power hardware.

What gets tested

  • Level 0 'Basic' — 3 controls, for a very low assessed cyber risk
  • Level 1 'Foundational' — 101 controls
  • Level 2 'Advanced' — 139 controls
  • Level 3 'Expert' — 144 controls

Also current

Control 0001 requires Cyber Essentials certification at EVERY level, 0 through 3. Control 0002 requires Cyber Essentials Plus at Levels 2 and 3 only. That single distinction is the one most often got wrong, and it is the difference between a certificate you can self-assess and one that is independently audited.

A document you can actually read

Def Stan 05-138 Issue 4 is free, public and citable on GOV.UK — 37 pages, published 23 May 2024.

How this differs from the American regime

The American analogue is DFARS 252.204-7012 with NIST SP 800-171 and CMMC — a different clause, a different control catalogue and a different certificate. The MOD publishes a mapping document between Def Stan 05-138 and NIST, ISO 27001 and Cyber Essentials, so existing evidence can be reused rather than rebuilt.

Careful

The assigned Cyber Risk Profile — not your own internal risk assessment — determines the minimum controls. The level is set by the MOD delivery team and arrives with the opportunity as a Risk Assessment Reference. A supplier who self-assesses to a level nobody assigned them has assessed the wrong thing.

Sources

Issue numbers and transition dates move, and several in this field are still quoted wrongly. The compliance calendar tracks the dates that moved, the ones that quietly passed, and thirteen this market repeats wrongly — each against the instrument it comes from.